Yesterday, in votes on three amendments to the Supplemental Appropriations bill to fund the war, the House:

-Rejected $168 billion in funding to continue the war in Iraq

-Set tough restrictions on the administration's conduct of the war, including imposing a timetable for withdrawal of U.S. troops, mandating minimum periods of rest for troops between deployments, barring the President from entering into long term commitments in Iraq without Congressional approval, and making the prohibition on torture crystal clear.

-Expanded the GI bill to provide education benefits for troops returning from Iraq and Afghanistan.

 
In the first vote, in which Congress rejected continued funding for the Iraq war, anti-war advocates had an unexpected ally: 132 Republicans refused to vote either for or against war funding, and simply voted "Present."

While Republicans have tried to spin this as a protest against the congressional procedures Democratic leaders used to bring this legislation to a vote, the practical reality is that House Republicans refused to vote to fund a war that they support. The only conclusion to be drawn is that Republicans are finally realizing that their President and party are significantly out of step with the clear will of the American people and that their electoral prospects in November are in serious jeopardy.

The Senate version of the Supplemental Appropriations bill, which still includes war funding, will be considered next week.
 

For a complete analysis of yesterday's vote, click here.

We asked you last week to e-mail your Representatives about this vote, and thousands of you responded.

Thank you for your hard work and support. Together we are making progress in bringing our troops home from Iraq.

FAIR USE NOTICE:

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of foreign policy, politics, peace, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.